RFI Browser

Back  RFI # 1027: OI05 in lieu of CLM07?

Formal vs. Informal Help Informal Formal

Submitter

Donald Graves

Description

As a followup question to HIR#851, is it the workgroup's intention to change the usage of OI05 in Loop 2320 to at least Situational (if not Required) in order to allow the reporting of non-Destination payer Accept Assignment values, thus becoming a crosswalk from CLM07 when doing COB? If not, why not?

Submitter Assigned Keywords

Accept Assignment COB

Response

The work group is not currently planning to change the usage of OI05 for the next version, as no business case has been presented for doing so.

Recommendation

The 837 work group recommends that the submitter bring this topic forward as a change request to the Designated Standards Maintenance Organizations' web site (www.hipaa-dsmo.org) or directly to the X12N/TG2/WG2 (837) workgroup co-chairs via e-mail (see the Work Groups link on www.x12n.org/portal) stating the business rationale.
Submission 4/19/2010
Status Date 5/21/2010
Status F - Final
Primary References
Document 005010X223
Section2
Page367
Set ID837I
Table2
Loop2320
Segment Position3100
Segment IDOI
Element Position05
Industry NameProvider Agreement Code
Secondary References
RFI ID 933
Document 005010X223
Section2
Page146
Set ID837I
Table2
Loop2300
Segment Position1300
Segment IDCLM
Element Position07
Industry NameProvider Accept Assignment Code